Marxism is a revolutionary movement aiming at creating a ground of equal social classes, in which the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat are equ whollyy sharing the means of production and property. Karl Marxs theory is stringently socio-economic, however Marx and his friend Engels wrote some personal observations and comments on modern and ancient literature, sporadically through their socio-economic books and articles or their letters.
Literature, in all its forms, to Marx, is part of the superstructure that is formed by the Base. Literature, along with the other conventions and institutions in the Superstructure, express and promote the ideology of the Base. The Ideology preserves and kit and boodle on maintaining the Status Quo of the Base. Literature then is a mirror of the society, promoting the ideology of the Base and is not involved or utilise to change this social reality. However, later Marxist critics viewed literature as being a major dynamic tool employ by both classes to express and stimulate their beliefs.
Engels believe that a work of art should mirror the society, regardless of the picture it portrays, whether with or against the beliefs of the author.
In a letter to the author of Die Alten und overstep Neuen (The old ones and the new), Minna Kautsky, he little expressed appreciation of the literary value of the novel; however he emphasized on the content of the novel:
You obviously felt a proneness to take a public stand in your book, to try to your convictions before the entire world. This has now been done; it is a leg you have passed through and need not repeat in this form. I am by no means oppose to partisan poetry as such. Both Aeschylus, the fuck off of tragedy, and Aristophanes, the father of comedy, were highly partisan poets...I think however that the purpose must...
If you indirect request to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment