Historical Validity in The Alamo :: essays research papers

Historical robustness in The AlamoIn the 2004 release, by Touchstone Pictures, The Alamo takes a famous report card told throughout time and recreates it on the screen once again. This time was it rightfully any wagerer than the other releases? Maybe the flashy effects and better film quality could interest you in this movie but the palpable question is how valid is it. To the average person this story looks as if they direct recreated it perfectly, but to a historian it might not look so genuine. Although this movie does depict many things with absolute efficiency some things be left out. Almost completely ignored in this movie atomic number 18 important instances in history such as the cowardly pile Fannin and the battle at Goliad. This is an important part of the story that has been left out. It could wipe out been nice to know what happened to the one person who could have helped but refused to payable to his own growing situation. Also in the movie James Bowie is en visioned as a mildly sick person whereas in actually life he deathly ill. He was known to have enteric fever fever and a bad case at that. Beyond the fallacies in this movie there were many great things that were put to the screen. One of the outflank in my opinion is the removal of the line that was drawn in the skank by Travis. According to much research the line was actually a story drawn up years later to help typify the sacrifices these men had made. They correctly portrayed how the men were outnumbered in this fight and the private road and courage that was put forth in this battle to defend the Alamo. The ultimately and most controversial issue in the movie is how did David Crockett really gnarl? In this movie they give him the courageous death that he was mentation to have.