Music Piracy Is a Good Thing Essay

If pirating euphony hurts euphonyians income so badly it would show, and after all t over-the-hill this time of pirating music it hasnt. Music piracy benefits artists more than it hurts, therefore it should be legal. Music piracy is mostly committed by people who ar e realday people who read average income jobs and deliver families who end up existence sued by big record companies oer downloading music for free. It seems a bit to greedy when you look at the difference in acquit between the artist and the people who download the songs. ( ) say that the people who buccaneer the music are more likely to go to the show and deprave the albums after downloading music (Ernesto).Also, people who pirate music tracks are very likely to develop an connection to the bands orartists and that will lead to them attending the shows, purchase albums and merchandise. When putting this issue in perspective, record companies are just smell for m maviny with protrude any consideration for th e ways of getting it. Record companies come in suing people who have downloaded music for ridiculous amount of money in attempt to intimidate and scare wrap up the fellons from downloading music outlaw(prenominal)ly. The main groups impact are college kids that dont have the money.Sarah Barg was a sophomore at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Sarah received an email from a label conjunction stating that she owed $3,000 to the Recording effort Association of America (Bratton). For that amount,, Sarah would be paying $7. 87 for each song. absolute majority of the songs she pirated were from the eighties and werent plain relevant anymore, and yet she was battling record companys in court over them them. Sixty students like Sarah at UNL received the same similar, as well as hundreds sent tabu to over sixty other universities across the country. Not knowing ow else to enshroud the situation, Barg contacted her parents and they had to cover her settlement. I dont know what I would have done. Im only 20 years old, says Barg. Well over five hundred students across the states have paid settlements to void being sued. I see it as bullying, UNL freshman Andrew Johnson says, Legally, it makes sense, because we dont have the money to fight back. Johnson illegally downloaded one song and settled $3,000 to avoid being sued for one song. The money used came from the 18 year olds college fund and he now has to work two jobs to retaliate for his losses.The record companies seem to target those cant fight back. In 2007, major record companies such as Warner music groups, Warner Bros Records, Inc. , and Sony BMG Music Entertainment, try to sue a young girl from Texas named Whitney Harper for illegally downloading music from bear down share-out networks on the internet (Malisow). Whitney was at the time was cardinal years old and was being sued for a minimum of $750 per song when Whitney downloaded thirtyseven songs. That is a little over $20,000 and she is only sixteen years old.Harper seek to use the Innocent Infringer Act that would reduce fees to $200 per song. In clubhouse to accomplish that, Harper had to prove she was unaware of the secure laws by claiming that the secure notice placed on cds were not on the archive sharing networks on the internet therefore she was unaware. The companies referred to the sixteen-year-old as a long con exquisites massive infringer of copyright laws. Harper warned that if the companies won the case that downloading music dispatch the Internet could never be innocent infringement. The Harper case is one the few after many years still going by dint of federal court.The companies had tell they were going to begin transitioning away from suing individuals and find infract means of fixing the issue. After years of record companies using an determent method to fix the pirating problem, it got them nowhere because the amount of pirates only went up, and the efforts by the companies were in most c ases useless. According to the Wall Street Journal, they attempted suing many angiotensin-converting enzyme mothers, a thirteen-year-old girl, and a dead peope. The new approach is for the companies to work with Internet service providers and when music is eing pirated the user receives a warning that they will lose Internet service if they continue(WSJ. com). The companies still reserve the right to sue if psyche is a heavy violator or has ignored several warnings, scarcely even with this new system, it still seems like the companies are only out for money, but in an attempt to escape negative attention from the media, they interchange their approach. According to The Independent, people who illegally download music also decease more money on music, concerts, merchandises than anyone else.The Secretary of State for Business, Peter Mandelson, stated that the record companies new approach to crack down on illegal down loaders by cutting off internet service could potentially ha rm the music industry more than help it. The people who file share are the ones who are interested in music. They use file sharing as a discovery mechanism. The artists also have mixed opinions over file sharing, some such as James uncivil and Lily Allen are anti-piracy and Shakira is pro-piracy(Shields). Sites have come out with monthly bills for unlimited music plans that seem fairer.Some artists dont feel affected by file sharing and support the fact that piracy creates a larger fan base for them. Bands like Angels and Airwaves have produced free records so copyright wasnt an issue. They figure that the fans will still come see them lam and record sales arent the only thing to being in a successful band. Some artists dont seem to overhear that. Most artists make plenty off of record sales even with a piracy problem, so court cases and law suits on usual people by record companies seems a bit greedy and selfish. flush with the new laws, they are still pushing to stop this u nstoppable problem. like a shot music piracy is referred to as a dead issue. Most cases that are still pending are being dropped. This year a $54,000 fine on a single mother of four was dropped by the U. S. regularize Court Judge, Micheal Davis, who stated piracy is no longer monstrous and shocking. The pauperization for deterrence cannot justify a two million verdict for thievery and distributing twenty-four songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music(physorg. om). Thomas Rasset was convicted in 2007 and was ordered to pay $220,000, but the judge who presided over the trial called off the verdict, saying it was wholly disproportionate and oppressive. Her case was one of the thousands that had actually make it to court. In 2011, with new laws, these cases should not be forgotten about. The people who anomic cases should be compensated and apologized to because they did nothing other than have an interest in the artist.