Sunday, 17 March 2019
The Rejection of Svidrigailov in Crime and Punishment :: Dostoevsky Crime and Punishment
The Rejection of Svidrigailov in disgust and Punishment Crime and Punishment Raskolnikov would reject Svidrigailov because he knows that this man has designs against his sister. Dounia has been his main concern for the past couple chapters-he hounds Svidrigailov not because he enjoys his company, but he worries endlessly some his intentions. Svidrigailov and Raskolnikov at the bar engage in a conversation about Dounia and the interactions of her and he at the house of Marfa Petrovna. Raskolnikov is eventually duped by the base Svid., and he lets him be after he has jumped on a carriage and is speeding down the road-he is not going to the Islands though, he is glide path back and has a meeting scheduled with Dounia. Svidrigailov, like Porfiry, employs tacit and shifty tactics. Raskolnikov realizes this, and he resents Svidrigailov for this. There is another very important reason why Raskolnikov hates Svid. As Hobbes pointed out, if a individual knows that another man knows the truth about a lie he is telling, or is in the position to arise out such information, he will subsequently hate that person no matter what previous relation they were in. This hate and dislike ordure be dulled, but even then it still has the ability to germ out in a deluge of rejection. Raskolnikov, so far, has been able to repress his anger towards Svidrigailov and also Porfiry. He does scream at Porfiry to either get him or let him be, but he is a good deal less externally forceful with his anger. Does Svidrigailov represent Raskolnikovs evil side? Does he embody the ideas and philosophies of Raskolnikov? perhaps it is easy to say yes-to simplify this great work of a doctrine and psychological writing. It is much better to steer away from the trap though of simply saying that he is the representation of R.s evil side. The story is much deeper than that. Svidrigailov molests, irks, and bothers young women who do not wish to be associated with him. He panders to their impuis sance and self-admittedly uses deception to win them for his own. This is not Raskolnikov. Raskolnikov is the man who conceives a theory-a theory that truly had the better of society as its aim-Svid. simply exists in a nihilistic atmosphere of vice and wanton behavior.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment