"Twelve Angry Men", by Reginald Rose.

This semester I read the sportsman Twelve Angry work force, by Reginald Rose. It is closely a jury trying to fool up with a verdict for a teenage male person child who is being accused of killing his father. In the play thither ar 2 very important characters. These characters are jurywoman function iii and juror arrive eight. Number Three is very against talking about anything. He is positive(p) that the boy is guilty and doesnt care to listen to any new(prenominal) opinions. juryman eightsome is very opposite of number three. Number Eight will always listen to all opinions and wants to look everything over. He does not know yet if the boy is guilty or innocent. In this play a very important glare is made. This point is: justice isnt justice if it is coloured. Many times in this play people added their own personal lives into what they felt happened on the night of the murder. They often looked at the boys background, and decided who he was by their expe riences and personal feelings. People have a natural animate to favor one side of a case or another. Usually these feelings come from a personal experience or built in beds. Often times these feelings were challenged. One mishap that a personal situation is effecting the case is done so by Juror Number Ten.

He is not guilty of being biased. He tells the other jurors, Ive lived amongem all my life. You cant call back a word they say. The helping of this sentence that makes it so biased is when he uses the words I amongem , and they . These words show that he is putting personal situations into his relation , also they characterized the boy i! nto a certain group from his background. though the man knows nothing about the defendant... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper