Addressing US Threats

People who notice weeny anomalies that could indicate potential act of terrorism should writing them, and we need to observe up on them wherever possible; this will entail developing a larger force of law enforcement officers.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a serious impediment to the struggle on terror in the United States. One of the President's objectives in the struggle on terror is to undercut the funding of terrorism throughout the world. Toward this end, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation have stipulated that among the millions of dollars they accomplish out each year, none of the recipients may use the cash in hand for terrorist activities. The ACLU has objected to this condition as "too restrictive," and has turned down o'er $1 million in grants from the two organizations ("ACLU says 'No, thanks'"). The ACLU stated its expostulation as vague language: "What do they mean by terrorism? What constitutes support for terrorism? We need to know simply what those words mean" (Masugi). Fox News host bar O'Reilly points regards the ACLU themselves as terrorists and points out that the ACLU "has no strategy to fight the war on terror at all. Everything the United States government does -- everything -- they belie" ("O'Reilly on ACLU: ?I hold back they're a terrorist group. ... I think they're terrorists'"). O'Reilly's comments were provoked by the ACLU'

s filing a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and for rubbish Bush administration anti-terrorism measures on the pretext that they are unconstitutional ("O'Reilly on ACLU: ?I think they're a terrorist group. ... I think they're terrorists'").

The ACLU's objection to Rumsfeld's approval of illegal interrogation methods, as good as measures such as the federal "no fly" lists not to mention surveillance and investigative powers that have been deepen for law enforcement officers puts them directly in the way of the country's efforts to halt terrorism. there does not appear to be any way in which they are willing to assist the country to rid itself of terrorism or terrorists.

The 9/11 Commission Report provides a large and comprehensive treatment of the 9/11 Commission's greenback of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the nation's preparedness for them and response to them, as well as recommendations for preventing future attacks ("The 9/11 Commission Report"). The repute details the events of 9/11, identifying Osama Bin Ladin as the one obligated for the attacks and pointing out that the government should have been prepared, but it had not taken the Al-Qaeda threat seriously enough ("Executive Summary," 11). The report delves into some of the history of Al-Qaeda activities prior to 9/11, present the gradual accumulation of intelligence on the group that present its clear intentions but failed to provide definitive proof of its deductive reasoning in variou
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!